Benchmark Investments

Home Insights MF Screener Fund Card

Fund Card

LIC MF Flexi Cap Fund-Reg(G)

very highequityflexi cap fund

105.87 -0.33(-0.32%) NAV as on 18 Sep 2024

5.48% 1 M

34.56% 1 Y

16.09% 3 Y

Growth Chart of the Scheme vis a vis benchmark

SCHEME DETAILS

Expenses Ratio :

2.26

As on 31 Aug, 2024

Age :

26 yrs 5 m

Since 31 03 ,1998

Exit Load :

AUM :

1,108.79 Crs

Portfolio Price To Book Value :

7.4

Investing Style :

Large Growth

Min. Investment :

SIP 1000 & Lumpsum 5000

Category :

flexi cap fund

Fund Manager :

Nikhil Rungta,Jaiprakash Toshniwal

Launch Date :

31-Mar-98

Scheme Benchmark :

FUND OBJECTIVE

The main investment objective of the schemes is to provide capital growth by investing across Large, Mid & Small Cap stocks. The investment portfolio of the scheme will be constantly monitored and reviewed to optimise capital growth.

RISKOMETER Level of Risk in the Scheme

Investors understand that their principal will be at very high risk

LATEST ASSET & PORTFOLIO ALLOCATION

as on Aug 31 ,2024

Others 2.47 %

Equity 97.53 %

TOP HOLDINGS

HDFC Bank Ltd.6.37 %

Hindustan Unilever Ltd.4.48 %

Piramal Pharma Ltd.3.25 %

Sudarshan Chemical Industries...2.79 %

Tech Mahindra Ltd.2.71 %

See All Holding

ALLOCATION BY MARKET CAP

ALLOCATION BY SECTOR

Bank - Private	9.97
IT - Software	8.98
Finance - NBFC	6.92
Household & Personal Products	6.66
Pharmaceuticals & Drugs	4.57

See All Sectors

5-YEARS HISTORY

Financial Year	2019-2020	2020-2021	2021-2022	2022-2023	2023-2024
NAV in Rs (as on 31-Mar-2024)	39.02	57.37	64.80	63.88	85.80
Net Assets(Rs Crores) (as on 31-Mar-2024)	238.52	358.98	402.30	383.41	942.29
Scheme Returns(%)(Absolute)	-16.05	52.37	12.50	-2.36	34.27
B'mark Returns(%)(Absolute)	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
Category Rank	37/234	189/218	165/204	17/36	26/39

Quarterly Performance - Last 5 Years (Absolute Ret. In %)

Financial Year	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4
2024-2025	15.54	NA	NA	NA
2023-2024	13.86	6.64	9.02	1.47
2022-2023	-9.11	11.49	0.00	-2.72
2021-2022	7.97	8.09	0.66	-3.86
2020-2021	13.14	4.64	21.43	2.28

PERFORMANCE COMPARISON WITH SIMILAR SCHEMES

No data found